
Last week, the government’s UK Research and Innovation department (UKRI) announced it was withdrawing annual funding for the Jodrell Bank Observatory which includes the iconic Lovell Telescope. This caused a predictable public outcry. Aside from historic status of the 70-year old site which grew out of the vision and determination of Sir Bernard Lovell in the post-war years, it continues to carry out ground-breaking research to this day, forming an important part of the pan-European e-Merlin network of radio telescopes. It also continues to inspire scientific curiosity and wonder in countless school children who flock to the visitor centre every day. It’s a designated World Heritage Site for heaven’s sake!
I understand that financial resources are finite and that budgets sometimes need to be cut. Those decisions are never easy. But Jodrell Bank’s annual funding of a paltry £2.8 million is, on the grand scale of UKRI funding, miniscule. It amounts to small change down the back of the government sofa. The savings contribution is vanishingly small and yet the damage done by withdrawing funding and the potential closure of the site is incalculable. This is flawed reasoning and a serious misjudgement. It’s hard to imagine that there aren’t better alternatives, ones that won’t be destroying something that is a quintessential part of our legacy of astronomical discovery and scientific understanding. What better example than Jodrell Bank is there that demonstrates the UK’s pioneering advances in radio astronomy and is recognised the world over? The Jodrell Bank Observatory continues to this day to make invaluable contributions to our understanding of the universe. Do we really want to sacrifice this?
So – pauses for breath, determined not to rant any more – when I was made aware of an open letter being sent to 10 Downing Street protesting against this funding decision and given a chance to add my signature, I did so without hesitation. The letter has gained a lot of attention in the media, and a lot of public support, helped no doubt by co-signatories such as Professor Brian Cox, Sir Brian May, Tim Peake and a whole host of scientists, writers, musicians and artists who stand behind this “foolish and shortsighted decision.”
For those who feel so inclined, there are a number of public petitions protesting the removal of Jodrell Bank’s funding. The Manchester Evening News has been covering the story assiduously and has organised its own petition here. Change.org has multiple petitions open, the one with the greatest number of signatures being this one.
Sadly, this is far from the only damaging funding cut that is coming down the line. The UK is cutting its contribution to the Rubin Observatory in Chile (which only began work last month) by 20%. Its planned work includes conducting the largest astronomical survey in history and it is undoubtedly going to generate some astonishing results for the participating astronomy groups. UK funding for the Next Generation Transit Survey (which is looking for solar systems similar to ours) is being cut by 45%. And the UK is withdrawing completely from the Event Horizon Telescope which is imaging the black hole at the heart of the Milky Way. Funding for all these projects, while not insignificant, is a tiny percentage of money routinely wasted or misappropriated across government (think of the billions lost in the various PPE scandals). This new UK government needs to get a grip on how it makes these judgement calls over funding and set its priorities straight.













